Black in Latin America, E03, "Mexico and Pero: The Black Grandma in the Closet"
Building from Ch. 2 “Harvest of Empire,” Gonzales’ argument that the Spanish colonies at one time looked to the English-American colonies as influential, social movements taking place back and forth between the southern and northern hemispheres of the Americas are very surprising. By the 15th century, the two settler cultures, England and Spain, had come west to violate, and reap resources from, a plethora of Indigenous cultures with no favorable terms of agreement or trade. What Dr. Gates’ documentary shows us is that even as each dominant settler culture grew and became derivatives of a European desire to conquer and remove Indigenous nations, histories in the South American countries are actually more complex and volatile than the English colonies in the north.
Building from Ch. 2 “Harvest of Empire,” Gonzales’ argument that the Spanish colonies at one time looked to the English-American colonies as influential, social movements taking place back and forth between the southern and northern hemispheres of the Americas are very surprising. By the 15th century, the two settler cultures, England and Spain, had come west to violate, and reap resources from, a plethora of Indigenous cultures with no favorable terms of agreement or trade. What Dr. Gates’ documentary shows us is that even as each dominant settler culture grew and became derivatives of a European desire to conquer and remove Indigenous nations, histories in the South American countries are actually more complex and volatile than the English colonies in the north.
Post-1492, where Gates’ doc ultimately
begins is already at time where Indigenous populations have shrunk from unfair
warfare and diseases unknown to that region of the world before. Each settler
colonial culture sharing slavery as a means of production is eye-opening,
however. The slave trade was much larger and somehow more brutal in South
America, as Spanish forces invaded to force trading and supplant a greed that
would change everything. On the one hand, again in Gonzales’ earlier argument,
he states that once countries in Latin America began to liberate themselves
from Spanish-colonial rule, they denounced slavery much quicker and the
populations were less worried in their society about mixing of ethnicities. Dr.
Gates can only point to so many countries, however, so how were/are things
different among each nation? How do the countries of Cuba or, for example,
Puerto Rico play/ed a role, staying under closer colonial rule, influence the
region? For the most part, while Dr. Gates does point to the pseudo-scientific
reasons used to justify slavery among shareholders and businesses alike, the
Catholic Church seemed open to the mixing of ethnicities in South American
countries. The rising up of people against the slave/caste system seems often
driven by priests a passionate congregations; what role might the nuns of the
church played in this? Certainly their histories are not visible above the
patriarchy. Lastly, with this acceptance and mixture of people on the ground,
there was some hope that the Spanish settlers would not flaunt, or commodify,
phenotypes, but ultimately forces at play eventually made a social construct of
‘black’ and ‘pure’ within some South American countries.
After viewing Dr. Gates doc, my mind
goes to diaspora and the general grand scale that peoples were made to flee,
spread out, shift, and generally move in the 16-18th century. If
everyone isn’t helping in the work to put the stories, narratives, and
histories back together pre-1492 than continually, over and over, a very narrow
vision of what happened post-1492 will prevail. Gates is showing viewers a
portrayal of how cultures were melding and coming together in a particular way
despite the Spanish influence and within this groups often seem to find
themselves fighting over what the term “nationalism” really means; who stands
for which country? As the United States colonial settler comes into play more
and more, even after Latino countries gained independence from Spanish, the
greed and ill-treatment was too great from the U.S., and, again, we have a
sweeping up of cultures into “easily identifiable” categories. But, the
histories don’t have to end here, and each person has to accept what has been
done, observe the structures of how whiteness/Christian churches worked to
upend the Catholic possibly. But, mainly there is work to do in putting back
together what we are learning was undone by these discriminating, falsifying,
and formidable forces of settler colonialism.